Tempered Vision
“…in the days of Herod the king” Matthew 2:1 ESV
“John appeared, baptizing in the wilderness…” Mark 1:4
“according to the customs of the priesthood, he was chosen by lot to enter the temple…” Luke 1:9
“Now they had been sent from the Pharisees” John 1:24
As we open the New Testament it is clear. This is a new world. One full of new customs, new rules, new rulers, new divisions, new everything. Herod is King but he has no genealogy or connection to King David, or any of the myriad of Northern Kings. His kingdom is founded on the might of Rome who sends its own to “help” as well. Looking at the Old Testament we don’t have baptism but the New Testament opens with a man characterized as John “the Baptist” and we are to know what that means. The Priests have developed new customs as the chief Priest is no longer compelled to enter the Holy of Holies but that privilege is done by lottery of some kind. And another group is even introduced known as the Pharisees. We are in Jerusalem but it seems as if all the signs have been moved and changed. The Greeks have come and gone. Rome has set up shop and we are not in Kansas anymore!
The Pharisees exist as the conservative party always trying to conserve what was given to the people and trying to prepare for the future conservative reign of the King of Kings as they would “Make Israel Great Again”. They had their unruly “far right” wing called the Zealots that wanted to take control faster and were significantly more willing to push the bounds of propriety. Then the Liberals were also there holding all the levers of authority and power as society was pressed ever more progressively towards the Hellenistic customs that would surely be the “right side of history.”
Coming full bore into this scene we understand that there was no going back. The quest for the old ways leaves you frozen in salt with Lot's wife watching as all that you loved is destroyed in judgment of the almighty. Leaving your husband, the only righteous man in Sodom, to fall to alcoholism as his daughters take the lead, and all future generations are plagued by immorality, idolatry, and inevitably are rejected by God. The quest to restore all that was, is understandable but destined to failure. R.R. Reno makes that comment in his book Return of the Strong Gods, speaking of religion, “But it cannot resume its old place in society”. There is no going back to the way it was. A society bound together around depression sensibilities and a brotherhood of military hardship did not come out of easy living. How could you possibly go back to such a time. Just as Rehoboam had to simply deal with the New Kingdom to his north, re-union was simply never going to happen, even if he dreamed of it as he put his crowned head on the pillow at night. The zealots would try to create their Jewish Kingdom only to fall to the might of Rome and destroy all they loved as the flames engulfed the temple.
What do we do now? Stephen Wolfe released his book The Case for Christian Nationalism and immediately was engulfed in what can politely be called push back. I have not read his book so am not prepared to give any comment on it specifically, but I listened to an interview he did and the interviewer noted the ferocity of some of the responses. It is that which I want to comment on. As they went back and forth one of them hypothesized the reason for the aggressive response was because of the articulate nature of an alternative vision. This wedged its way into my mind and I have not been able to shake the implication of it. The thought that came full force upon me was “Are Christians merely tempering the secular vision or providing a truly unique biblical vision of the future?” As I thought upon these things the reality of Britain and Canada specifically made more sense. The “conservative” parties in these countries, as well as most of Europe, are simply less left than the parties of “progress”. Why? Is it not probable that the conservative parties really are going to the same place they just don’t want to get there as fast? They are simply tempering the vision of the left. The only real threat to the left is a truly alternative vision of what the future should be. The strength of the zealots of the right only act to slow down the inevitable beat of that future. Yet, if a truly alternative vision rears its head, it no longer functions as a matter of time but rather it threatens to derail everything.
What Christians must do is not simply temper the secular vision but provide the biblical vision of life. One centered and lived in full to the glory of God. The difference between a Christians later years and their secular neighbor’s retirement must be more than simply a few less trips to Las Vegas and a trip to Jerusalem. Is a Christian home simply one with a couple kids more than average, prayer before meals, and Sunday morning conflict? What of our Christian Communities? We must lift our gaze to see what God’s vision for us is, not merely temper our hope around a more pasteled vision of the future than our neighbors. How biblically vibrant is your five-year plan?
Coram Deo